Summary report for sleep study
TITLE: SOCIO-BEHAVIORAL PILOT STUDY TO DETERMINE THE EFFECT OF
TESLAR WATCH IN HEALTHY VOLUNTEERS WITH NON-RESTORATIVE SLEEP
AUTHOR: SUZANNE R. MARTINEZ, MA, CCRP
A total of 10 healthy volunteers were randomly enrolled to participate in study by using
the Teslar Watch over the course of one week period at Sleep Solutions’ Sleep Labs
under principal investigator, Dr. Lettelier, a research pulmonary doctor in the Miami
area. Inclusion eligibility criteria included any persons over 18 years of age with the
complaint of non-restorative sleep. Principal exclusion criteria included any volunteer
that after obtaining medical history, clinical evaluation and screening polysomnographic
test was diagnosed with a medical condition related to sleep.
Five (5) healthy volunteers were initially enrolled and at completion an interim analysis
was done and it was determined that another 5 volunteers should be enrolled; totaling
10 volunteers. Pre-and Post -Assessment included clinical sleep quality questionnaires,
Polysomnography testing, and diary. Additional measures at pre and post test included
medical history, sleep history, pregnancy screen, and basic clinical evaluation. The
primary outcome evaluated the potential benefits and socio-behavioral changes in
restoring non-restorative sleep for healthy volunteers using the PST watch.
PRIMARY OBJECTIVE
The primary objective of this socio-behavioral study was to evaluate the potential
benefits and socio-behavioral changes in healthy volunteers using the Philip Stein
Teslar (PST) watch in restoring non-restorative sleep.
HYPOTHESIS
The hypothesis tested was: A watch with Teslar technology is more effective for helping
restoring non-restorative sleep (a non-medical sleeping problem) in healthy volunteers
within eight days.
RESULTS
As previously stated, the interim analysis showed initial positive results; therefore, it was
concluded that an additional five volunteers be enrolled. Upon study completion, all the
data was collected and organized for biostatistician review. Dr. Hardigan, Executive
Director of Assessment, Evaluation, and Faculty Development Center at NOVA
Southeastern University reviewed the data and submitted the report to the sponsor,
Philip Stein Teslar.
The statistical report included statistical analyses conducted to see if differences exist
between the baseline and termination phases of the study’s four outcomes: (1) Sleep
Phase, (2) Sleep Efficiency, (3) Epworth Scale (sleepiness) and (4) SF-36 physical and
mental functioning.
According to the statistical report, generally speaking the watch appeared to have a
positive effect on all four outcomes. However, specific statistical significance was
uncovered for the following measures (1) Stage-of-Sleep, (2) Epworth Sleepiness
Scale, and (3) SF-36 Mental Health Subscale (p < .05).
- Stage-of-Sleep
Stage-of-Sleep specifically determines how long a volunteer remained in one of the four
stages of sleep; Stage I, Stage II, Stage III and REM. Note: Stage III (Delta) and REM
are the restorative stages of sleep which affect quality of sleep. The study investigated
whether there was an increase in these two specific stages of sleep. A comparison was
made for change in “Quality” sleep, defined as the percentage of sleep in Stage 3 and
REM, between the baseline and termination measurements. A 13.5 percent
(confidence interval of 7.6% <> 19.4%) improvement in “Quality” sleep was noted
between the baseline and termination phases of the study. All subjects reported a
statistically significant improvement in “Quality” sleep.
- Epworth Sleepiness Scale
Epworth Sleepiness Scale determines the daytime sleepiness. Nine of the ten patients
reported an improvement in sleepiness.
- SF 36
The SF 36 is a clinically validated questionnaire investigating quality of life; specifically
in two areas, physical functioning and mental functioning.
Two analyses were conducted to look for differences between the baseline and
termination stages for SF-36 subscales physical functioning (PCS) and mental health
(MCS). Five patients reported an improvement in physical functioning, two reported no
change, and three subjects reported a decrease in performance. For the MCS subscale
the modified paired t-test (p < .06) and the Wilcoxon Sign-Rank (p < .03) tests did
demonstrate statistical significance. Overall mental health improved by an average of
4.43 percent (confidence interval of 1.46<>10.33). Nine subjects reported an
improvement in mental health while one patient reported a decrease. Patient ten
presented the largest improvement in mental health (24.6%).
CONCLUSION
The PST watch appears to be an effective tool for improving Stage III and REM sleep,
daytime sleepiness and mental capacity. It is likely in part that a possible theoretical
explanation may be that by improving Stage III and REM sleep, the volunteer is waking
up more refreshed, hence indirectly improving daytime sleepiness and mental capacity
functioning during the day. The PST watch appears to be safe as there were no
adverse events documented. The testimonials of the volunteers suggested that they felt
calmer by the end of the week. As a small outcome pilot study, a larger placebocontrolled
study is recommended by the biostatistician and research staff. Based upon
the suggested favorable data presented in this initial study further clinical investigations
are warranted.